Our approach to property analysis
Methodology in action
Discover transparency, rigour, and consistency in the way we approach every analysis. Starting with your initial inquiry, we collect relevant data, apply established assessment criteria, and present findings in accessible, structured formats. Our team adheres to Australian regulations and applies context-specific considerations to each case, ensuring truly actionable advice.
Meet our experts
Our dedicated property advisors
Rachel Evans
Lead Analyst
Master of Urban Planning Monash University
EastWest Advisory
Core skills
Methods
Certifications
Rachel specialises in property feasibility and infrastructure impact studies, bringing over 15 years of sector experience.
Rachel’s comprehensive experience includes both private and government projects. She is dedicated to clear reporting, transparent findings, and reliable communication throughout every client engagement.
David Hooper
Infrastructure Expert
Bachelor of Civil Engineering University of Melbourne
CivicConsult Group
Core skills
Methods
Certifications
With a focus on large-scale development impacts, David brings essential technical skills and urban strategy knowledge.
David has delivered technical input to government reviews and corporate projects. His subject knowledge ensures every assessment meets regulatory and industry standards.
Sophia Chen
Senior Market Analyst
Master of Property University of Sydney
MetroReal Solutions
Core skills
Methods
Certifications
Sophia provides advanced analytics on property markets, supporting precise decision-making for clients in complex regions.
Sophia’s approach combines data modelling with practical application, ensuring that clients have the information needed to confidently move forward with their property interests.
Paul Singh
Project Evaluator
Diploma of Project Management RMIT University
UrbanEdge Projects
Core skills
Methods
Certifications
Paul draws on his talent for stakeholder liaison and procedural review, adding value to every tailored consultation.
Paul’s strong record in collaborative project reviews ensures that each report reflects all critical perspective. He prioritises clear dialogue and outcomes aligned to client objectives.
Our market analysis process
Every step is designed to ensure transparency, regulatory alignment, and actionable outcomes for Australian property markets and infrastructure projects.
Initial client consultation stage
We start with an in-depth discussion with clients to clarify project scope, property types, and the objective driving each analysis. This helps us ensure every assessment is relevant from the start.
Project briefing
Project needs, objectives, and background defined.
Goal alignment
Stakeholder priorities captured and clarified.
Data collection and verification
Reliable market data, planning documents, and statutory information are gathered. Rigorous verification underpins each conclusion and supports regulatory compliance.
Data integrity
Verified for currency and accuracy.
Regulation review
Statutory compliance is prioritised.
Evaluation and scenario modelling
Relevant infrastructure and property factors are modelled against market trends. Each finding is tested for reliability and contextual suitability.
Scenario analysis
Regional variables and influences mapped.
Risk-tested
Outcomes appraised for certainty and clarity.
Presentation of actionable recommendations
Advice is delivered in a clear, accessible report, with steps for ongoing project or property management. Clients receive structured findings and guidance for the next stage.
Written report
Findings and recommendations delivered.
Follow up support
Ongoing availability for clarification.
How we differ from others
volarentyra stands apart by offering transparent, methodical project analysis focused strictly on client needs, not generic templates or automated reports.
| Key Features | volarentyra | MetroVal Advisors | UrbanMetric Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Depth of local research | Extensive, ongoing | Periodic | General |
| Customised reporting | Every project | Limited | Template-based |
| Transparency of method | Full disclosure | Partial | Limited |
| Consultation with specialists | Direct access | Available | By request |